May 13, 2011

The ESOP Association 2009 Year-End Legislative Update

S. 1612 – The ESOP Promotion and Improvement Act of 2009:

On August 6, 2009, Senator Blanche L. Lincoln (D-AR) introduced S. 1612, the ESOP Promotion and Improvement Act of 2009. The legislation has four sections, including an entirely new proposal to remove a 35 year bias against ESOP companies by the Small Business Administration.

One, S. 1612 would repeal the punitive 10% penalty tax on S corporations distributions from current earnings, also referred to as dividends, placed on the distributions from current earnings that are passed through to ESOP participants in cash.

Two, S.1612 would clarifY that dividends paid by C corporations on ESOP stock are not a preference item in calculating the corporate alternative minimum tax.

Three, S. 1612 improves the 1042 ESOP tax deferred rollover provisions by (a.) permitting sellers to the ESOP of an S corporation to utilize the ESOP tax benefit referred to as the tax deferred rollover, or the so-called 1042 treatment; (b.) permitting proceeds received from a 1042 transaction to be reinvested in mutual funds consisting of operating U.S. corporation securities; and (c.) redefining what is a 25% owner, for purposes of IRC 1042, as a 25% owner or more of voting stock, or 25% owner or more of all stock of the corporation, instead of current law definition that owning of 25% of any class of stock is a 25% owner for purposes of IRC 1042.

And, four, S. 1612 would eliminate a bias against majority owned ESOP companies by making clear that a nonESOP small businesses currently eligible for any Small Business Administration program is still eligible for the SBA program if becoming a majority owned ESOP company with the same characteristics it had before becoming a majority owned ESOP company. (A majority owned ESOP company is 50% plus owned by the ESOP on behalf of the employees.)

Senator Blanche Lincoln is the Senior Senator from Arkansas elected in 1998 and as the fifth ranking majority member of the Senate Committee on Finance, chairs the Social Security, Pensions, and Family Policy Subcommittee.

Senator Mary L. Landrieu (D-LA) is an original co-sponsor. Senator Landrieu is chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

H.R. 3586 – The S Corporation ESOP Promotion and Expansion Act of 2009:

On September 16,2009 Congressman Ron Kind (D .. WI) introduced H.R. 3586, The S Corporation ESOP Promotion and Expansion Act of 2009, to improve and promote S ESOP laws. In general, the bill would: permit owners of S stock to sell their stock to an ESOP under the same treatment C stock of a private company receives under Internal Revenue Code Section 1042, also known as the ESOP cap gains deferred rollover provision: permit a lender to S corporations to exclude 50% of its interest income if the loan is used for a qualified employer securities loan modeled after former IRC Section 133; permit an S ESOP to assume estate tax liability of an estate if S stock of equal value is transferred to the S corporation ESOP; and establish a Federal program in the the Department of Labor to encourage S ESOP creation. H.R 3586 was co-sponsored by Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR).

H.R. 692 – To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income compensation received by employees consisting of qualified distributions of employer stock:

Introduced on January 26, 2009 by Congressman Dana Rohrabacher [R-CA-46], H.R. 692 would exempt from tax the value of company stock paid directly to an employee if the employee holds the stock for at least 10 years. This proposal would be most suitable for a publicly traded company. As such, H.R 692 is the first to encourage employee ownership in a publicly traded company over the 2001 law. The 2001 law expanded the federal tax deduction for dividends paid on ESOP stock to permit a deduction for dividends reinvested by the employee back to the plan to acquire more company stock.

H. Con. Res. 204 .. Expressing continued support for employee stock ownership plans:

Introduced on October 22,2009 by Congressman Maurice Hinchey [D-NY-22], H. Con. Res. 204 expresses continued support for employee stock ownership plans. The text of the resolution follows:

Whereas in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Congress codified a technique of corporate finance which utilizes employee stock ownership, officially named an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP);

Whereas in the 35 years since the statutory recognition ofESOPs, there have been ample data collected by objective research indicating that the vast majority of corporations sponsoring employee stock ownership through ESOPs are high performing companies that, among other indicia of high performing companies, have better sales, are more sustainable, pay better, and provide more retirement savings compared to similar companies that are not employee-owned; and

Whereas Congress, in more than 15 laws since 1974, has made it explicit that ESOPs are to serve the dual purpose of providing retirement savings and stock ownership for employees, as well as being a financing technique for corporations:

Now, therefore, be it resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), that Congress expresses its continued support for
employee stock ownership plans.

Click here to download the full article in pdf format

Share this article:
LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
WhatsApp

Learn why an ESOP is better for You,
your Business, and your Employees

Upcoming Web Seminar

Free 90-Minute Webinar for Business Owners, CFOs & Advisors

Learn how ESOPs fuel growth, reduce taxes, and power succession—without giving up control.

Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds

Why 2026 is the Time for ESOPs

Strong companies are using ESOPs to play offense. With rates stabilizing and talent still tight, employee ownership is delivering a durable edge:

    • Founder Liquidity—On Your Terms. Create a market for your shares without selling to private equity or competitors.
    • Major Tax Efficiency. Enable capital‑gains deferral for selling shareholders (Section 1042 eligibility) and reduce or even eliminate ongoing corporate income tax for S‑Corporation ESOPs—freeing cash for growth.
    • Talent Magnet. Meaningful employee ownership boosts engagement, retention, and performance—without relying solely on wage increases.
    • Resilient Margins. ESOP tax advantages help counter wage pressure, input costs, and tariffs—so more operating cash flows to strategy.
    • Control & Culture Intact. Transition ownership while keeping leadership and values in place.. Transition ownership while keeping leadership and values in place.

Bottom line: ESOPs create a rare win‑win‑win—for owners, the business, and employees.

What You’ll Learn

ESOP 101—Modern Playbook
How ESOPs work in 2026, who qualifies, deal structures, and timelines.

Tax Strategies that Change the Math
Capital‑gains deferral, corporate tax reduction/elimination for S‑Corp ESOPs, deductible contributions, and cash‑flow modeling.

Talent & Culture
Retention without across‑the‑board raises; ownership communications that actually move the needle.

Protecting Margins
How ESOP incentives can offset cost inflation and support reinvestment.

Valuation & Financing in Today’s Market
Bank/seller notes, mezzanine options, rate considerations, and why “bankable ESOPs” are closing now.

Governance & Control
Board, trustee, and management roles—what really changes (and what doesn’t).

Who Should Attend

    • Business Owners planning an exit, partial sale, or recapitalization

    • CFOs evaluating capital structure and tax strategy

    • Advisors & Succession Planners guiding owner‑led companies

    • HR & ESOP Committee Members building engagement around ownership

Agenda (90 Minutes)

    1. Welcome, Speakers & Why ESOPs in 2026 (5 min)
      Quick orientation; who Menke is and why ESOPs are winning right now.
    2. ESOP Basics & Business Owner Benefits (10 min)
      What an ESOP is; liquidity, diversification, succession, productivity.
    3. Myth‑Busting: What ESOPs Do—and Don’t—Require (5 min)
      No, you don’t have to sell 30%+, borrow big, or give up control.
    4. Deal Structures & Transaction Paths (10 min)
      Cash‑contribution (pay‑as‑you‑go), leveraged (bank/seller notes), and stock contribution; when each fits.
    5. Typical Scenarios & Outcomes (10 min)
      Gradual sales, minority/majority sales, 100% buyouts, and recap strategies.
    6. Who’s a Strong Fit (and Common Constraints) (5 min)
      Profitability, team/transition readiness, industry notes.
    7. Tax Strategy Deep Dive (10 min)
      S‑Corp ESOP distribution savings; C‑Corp §1042 capital‑gains deferral; entity‑path options.
    8. Valuation & Pricing vs. Third‑Party Sales (8 min)
      FMV standards, control vs. minority value, practical comparisons.
    9. Financing the ESOP (8 min)
      Bank market overview, seller paper, balance‑sheet effects, cash‑flow modeling.
    10. Plan Operations & Employee Communications (8 min)
      Eligibility, vesting, distributions, disclosures, and how transparency drives results.
    11. Culture, Engagement & Measured Performance Uplift (6 min)
      What changes on day 2; tying ownership to productivity.
    12. Roadmap & Next Steps (3 min)
      Feasibility, design/adopt, contributions, and timing the sale.
    13. Live Q&A (2 min)

Hear From Past Attendees

“I came in skeptical. I left with a concrete roadmap and the math to brief our board.”

“This clarified our exit plan and showed how we can reward employees at the same time."

Your Presenter: Phil DeDominicis

Phil DeDominicis is an ESOP strategist and M&A advisor who has guided 300+ companies through ESOP formations, financing, and transactions over 20+ years at Menke & Associates. He specializes in selling ESOP‑owned businesses to financial or strategic buyers and in helping ESOP companies acquire other businesses.

Before Menke, Phil spent 14 years in investment banking M&A at Morgan Stanley and Salomon Smith Barney, advising middle‑market companies on change‑of‑control transactions. He holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Delaware (1985) and an MBA in Finance & Accounting from UCLA Anderson (1989). Phil currently serves on six for‑profit and not‑for‑profit boards.

What Phil will cover:

    • Where ESOPs win in 2026 (tax, talent, and control)
    • Owner liquidity paths: minority, majority, and 100% sales
    • Financing options and what lenders look for
    • Valuation reality vs. third‑party sales
    • How to prep a board, trustee, and employees for a successful close

Reserve Your Spot Now

Seats are limited. Save yours now and receive the ESOP Feasibility Checklist.

10:00AM – 11:30AM PT
11:00AM – 12:30PM MT
12:00PM – 1:30PM CT
1:00PM – 2:30PM ET

No cost. Suitable for companies with $5M–$500M+ in revenue across construction, manufacturing, services, distribution, tech, and more.

FAQ (Quick Hits)

    • Do I lose control? No—most ESOPs preserve day‑to‑day control with your leadership team and board.

    • Is this only for certain industries? ESOPs work across sectors when cash flow is stable and leadership continuity matters.

    • Can we do a partial sale? Yes—stage liquidity over time while capturing tax benefits.

READY FOR AN ESOP NOW?

Interested in finding out how an ESOP could work for your company?

For a free preliminary analysis, just fill out our ESOP Feasibility Questionnaire.

Related Articles

Man viewing employee stock ownership plan presentation on computer screen.
July 29, 2026
Don’t miss this opportunity to discover how ESOPs can align your business goals with the needs of employees and stakeholders.
Brass straightedge on slate, representing consistent ESOP valuation standards under new federal law
September 17, 2026
For fifty years, the hardest question in employee ownership was not how to finance the deal or how to structure the tax benefits. It was what “adequate consideration” actually meant. Congress has now answered it — and the answer is narrower, and more useful, than the headlines suggest.
Unfinished steel-frame building with a focused beam of light, representing AEC marketing and ideal client focus
September 14, 2026
Most contractors say they win work on relationships, and most are right, up to a point. What happens when the people who hold those relationships retire, or when the firm tries to grow into a market where nobody knows its name?
Abstract suspended architectural span under cable tension, representing the long-term structure of a Section 1042 tax deferral
August 31, 2026
A seller who elects Section 1042 on a $100 million ESOP transaction can defer roughly $33 million in capital gains tax, potentially for life. The same election, structured without care, can leave that seller carrying leverage on a securities portfolio for decades. The difference is in how the portfolio is built.
Abstract network of interconnected nodes representing ESOP employee ownership culture
August 17, 2026
Two companies can have identical ESOP structures on paper and produce completely different results. The difference usually comes down to three specific things — and most companies get at least one of them wrong.
Abstract image of a converging path symbolizing a 2026 ESOP market midyear review
August 3, 2026
Halfway through 2026, the ESOP market looks different than it did in January — bank lending is more competitive, private equity firms are eyeing ESOPs as an exit, and legislation is moving. Here’s what’s actually changed.