What Four Decades of Employee Ownership Actually Looks Like
Most discussions of ESOPs focus on the transaction: the sale, the tax treatment, the financing. Far less attention goes to what happens in the decades that follow. Yet the long run is where an ESOP either proves itself or doesn’t — in whether the company keeps growing, whether employee accounts build real wealth, and whether the culture the founders hoped for actually takes hold.
There is a persistent assumption among owners of privately held companies that employee ownership and ambitious growth are incompatible — that an ESOP company must settle into a slow, conservative posture. The record of long-tenured ESOP companies suggests otherwise, but that record is hard to see from the outside. It requires hearing from the people who have actually run these companies over decades: how they make decisions, how they educate employees, and how the structure shapes strategy.
This post draws on a conversation with the current and recently retired CEOs of CCI Systems, a network infrastructure firm that has been employee owned since 1985. It covers how the ESOP was formed, how it changed the company’s decision-making horizon, how the company built and maintains its ownership culture, and how it now uses the ESOP as an advantage in acquisitions and recruiting.
🎙️ Listen to the Episode
Video Transcript
Chapter 1: Introduction: CCI Systems’ 40-year ESOP story
Chapter 2: What CCI Systems does today
Chapter 3: Why the founders chose an ESOP in 1985
Chapter 4: What employee ownership has meant to CCI’s durability
Chapter 5: ESOP vs. public and private equity time horizons
Chapter 6: Educating employees and sharing results
Chapter 7: Values, habits, and hiring for alignment
Chapter 8: How ownership changes strategic decisions
Chapter 9: Balancing short-term and long-term value
Chapter 10: Growth outlook: fiber, AI, wireless, energy
Chapter 11: Data centers and energy convergence
Chapter 12: Acquisition strategy and recent deals
Chapter 13: Why ESOPs appeal to selling owners
Chapter 14: The ESOP as a recruiting tool
Chapter 15: Building an ownership culture from the top
Chapter 16: Troy’s first impressions of leading an ESOP
Chapter 17: Parting advice
The 1985 Transaction: An ESOP as a Founders’ Succession Plan
CCI Systems traces its roots to partners who went into business together in the mid-1950s as pioneers in the cable television industry. Over time they built several businesses, most of them operating cable networks and cable construction companies. What later became CCI Systems was the engineering and construction arm of that portfolio.
When the founders approached the end of their careers, they sold the asset-based businesses to outside buyers. But they wanted the services business — their namesake — to continue as part of their legacy. An ESOP offered a way to put the company in the hands of the employees who ran it. On May 1, 1985, the company was established in the ESOP at a price of $24 per share, with 75% of the stock going into the plan.
Forty years later, the company reports more than 1,000 employees and average share value growth of roughly 10% per year since the ESOP was formed. Along the way, CCI evolved well beyond its cable roots. Today it describes itself as a network integration partner delivering end-to-end critical infrastructure solutions — fiber to the home and business, wireless engineering and site services, energy-sector work, data center infrastructure, and managed enterprise services through its GuideStar division.
The Time Horizon Advantage: ESOP vs. Public and Private Equity Ownership
Troy Knuckles, CCI’s current CEO, spent his career at public companies and private-equity-backed firms before joining CCI — the first ESOP company he has worked for. His comparison is direct: the difference in how employees operate and how leadership makes decisions is stark.
In his view, the defining advantage of the ESOP is the freedom to make the right decision for the business, whether that decision pays off this quarter or four years from now. Public companies answer to quarterly earnings expectations. Private equity owners typically operate on a five-to-seven-year hold before selling the company again. An ESOP has no such clock. CCI’s leadership can make investments today that will not produce tangible results for two, three, or four years — decisions that, in Knuckles’ experience, other ownership structures either penalize heavily or prevent outright.
That freedom has practical consequences. Before Knuckles joined, CCI’s leadership divested successful businesses that no longer fit the company’s long-term direction. More recently, it has made acquisitions designed to pay off years down the road. Both kinds of moves, he notes, would be difficult under quarterly-earnings pressure or a private equity hold period.
Building an Ownership Culture on Purpose
John Jamar, CCI’s recently retired CEO, is candid that the culture did not emerge on its own. The company worked deliberately at it.
Written values and daily habits
A group of more than 20 employees worked together to write down the company’s values. The team then went further, defining the specific habits that bring those values to life — how people treat each other, how they treat customers, how decisions get made, and what the company champions and what it does not tolerate. Each habit was documented with a brief explanation of what it looks like in practice.
Hiring for alignment
Those values were built into the hiring process. Recruiters ask open-ended questions tied to them, which Jamar says produced far better alignment with candidates from the start — reinforcing the culture rather than diluting it as the company grew.
Explaining the ESOP itself
CCI’s ESOP communications committee organized its work around two objectives. First, explain to employees — especially newer ones — how the ESOP works: how it supports earnings capacity, reduces the company’s risk profile, improves its use of capital, and increases the value of ownership. Second, connect the plan to each employee’s specific role, showing how they and the people around them contribute.
Transparency with results
The company shares its results with employees multiple times per quarter, and always frames those results in terms of what they mean to employee owners. Once people understand the numbers, Knuckle says, they understand how their individual actions move them. Jamar adds that the concept becomes concrete over time: as employees see contributions accumulate and share value build in their annual statements, ownership stops being abstract.
Growth Through Market Adjacencies
CCI’s acquisition strategy centers on what Knuckles calls market adjacencies — services next to what the company already does. Two recent examples from the conversation:
-
- Total Site Services, acquired roughly a year before the recording, provides tower and small cell design, construction management, and site selection for major wireless carriers. The deal moved CCI from a primarily wireline company into wireless, and the business now operates as CCI’s wireless arm.
- Latent Surveys, a Salt Lake City land surveying firm acquired about 30 days before the recording, had been a subcontractor to CCI’s wireless team. CCI plans to expand it from a regional operation to a national one.
The pattern is deliberate: find a strong regional firm in an adjacent service line, then use CCI’s national footprint and financial strength to scale it. Geography matters less than the service fit.
The ESOP plays a role in these deals, too. Many selling owners care deeply about what happens to their employees. A sale to a private equity firm or a public company offers little assurance on that front. Joining an ESOP company means employees receive ownership going forward — which, Knuckle says, is often exactly what these owners are looking for.
Looking Ahead
CCI’s leadership sees a long runway: fiber demand driven by AI and data center buildout, continued wireless growth (which still requires wired infrastructure behind it), and the convergence of energy and communications networks. But the throughline of the conversation is not the market — it is the structure. Knuckles’ advice to CEOs who want an ownership culture is to start at the top, with purposeful and intentional leadership, and he argues the ESOP is the structure best suited to making that commitment real. CCI’s 40-year record is one data point that employee ownership and sustained growth are not an either/or choice.
If you are a business owner weighing succession options and want to understand whether an ESOP fits your company, a good first step is a preliminary feasibility review. You can complete Menke’s Feasibility Questionnaire for a free preliminary analysis at https://www.menke.com/free-preliminary-analysis/, or reach our team directly at https://www.menke.com/contact-us.
Considering an ESOP?
Request a confidential preliminary feasibility review to evaluate:
- structural viability
- liquidity and control
- tax advantages
- succession options
No cost. No obligation.
Related Resources
About ESOP Radio
ESOP Radio is the official ESOP podcast from Menke — where real stories of growth, succession, and long-term wealth building are told.
Hosted by Trevor Gilmore and Ben Spadt, the show features conversations and educational episodes designed to help business owners better understand employee ownership.
Disclaimer
This podcast is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or fiduciary advice.
Phil DeDominicis is an ESOP strategist and M&A advisor who has guided 300+ companies through ESOP formations, financing, and transactions over 20+ years at Menke & Associates. He specializes in selling ESOP‑owned businesses to financial or strategic buyers and in helping ESOP companies acquire other businesses.




