An ESOP is, at its core, a legal structure: a trust that holds company stock on behalf of employees, governed by ERISA and a plan document. But the companies that get real performance benefits from employee ownership treat the ESOP as a starting point, not an end point. The legal structure creates the opportunity for an ownership culture. It does not create the culture itself.
That distinction matters more than most business owners realize before they go through a transaction. It is common to assume that once employees are technically owners, they will begin thinking and acting like owners on their own. In practice, many companies set up an ESOP, send out an annual share price statement, and see little change in day-to-day behavior. The employees are owners in a legal sense, but they do not understand what that ownership means, how it accrues value, or what their own actions have to do with it.
This post covers what separates companies that build a real ownership culture from companies that simply have the paperwork: how employees need to understand the connection between their work and the share price, why transparency about company financials is not optional, and why the process of building this culture rarely goes smoothly the first time.
🎙️ Listen to the Episode
Video Transcript
Chapter 1: Welcome and Introduction to Certified EO
Chapter 2: How Certified EO Started: A B Corp-Inspired Origin Story
Chapter 3: Joe Belsterling’s Path From Ed-Tech Founder to Certified EO CEO
Chapter 4: What the Certified EO Designation Actually Certifies
Chapter 5: Why Not All Employee Ownership Is Created Equal
Chapter 6: From Certification to Education: How the Organization Evolved
Chapter 7: ESOP Equity vs. Startup Stock Options: A Different Risk Profile
Chapter 8: The Single Biggest Change When Employees Become Owners
Chapter 9: The Bank Account Analogy: Deposits, Withdrawals, and Ownership Culture
Chapter 10: Which Industries Fit Employee Ownership Best
Chapter 11: The Data: Productivity and Stock Price Performance in ESOP Companies
Chapter 12: Case Study: Legacy Utility Group and the Value of Small Daily Decisions
Chapter 13: The Three-Part Secret Sauce of a Strong Ownership Culture
Chapter 14: Tools Certified EO Offers to Build Employee Understanding and Engagement
Chapter 15: Closing Thoughts and Where to Find Certified EO
What the ESOP Structure Actually Provides
An ESOP is a qualified retirement plan that holds employer stock in trust for the benefit of employees. It comes with specific legal features: a repurchase obligation, meaning the company or plan is required to buy back shares from employees when they leave or retire; vesting schedules that determine when employees have a nonforfeitable right to their account balance; and an independent valuation process that determines the share price each year, typically based on a formula involving a multiple of profit and other financial factors.
These features distinguish ESOP ownership from other forms of employee equity, such as stock options at a venture-backed startup. Startup equity is generally illiquid unless the company is acquired or goes public, and its value depends entirely on a single exit event. An ESOP, by contrast, is built around a longer time horizon. Employees accrue value gradually as the company’s share price appreciates year over year, and that value compounds over the course of a career rather than depending on one outcome.
Because the value of an ESOP account is tied to the company’s ongoing performance rather than a single transaction, the mechanics of the plan matter less to day-to-day culture than most business owners expect. What matters more is whether employees understand those mechanics well enough to act on them. Tax treatment, valuation methodology, and repurchase obligation funding all vary by plan and company circumstances, and any specific application to your company’s plan document should be reviewed with your ERISA counsel or plan administrator.
The Common Factor Behind Underperforming ESOPs
Research on employee-owned companies points to participative management — not the ESOP transaction itself — as a leading factor separating companies that outperform their peers from companies that underperform. Research from Rutgers has found that employee-owned companies have averaged 7 to 10% higher productivity than comparable non-ESOP companies over a 20-year period, a gap that compounds meaningfully as it plays out year after year. But that productivity advantage is not automatic. It shows up most consistently in companies where employees understand what it means to act and think like an owner, not simply in companies with the largest percentage of employee ownership on paper.
It is common for a company to become 100 percent employee owned, distribute an annual share price statement, and see very little change in behavior. Employees receive the number, do not fully understand what produced it or what would move it, and continue working exactly as they did before the transaction. The ownership is real in a legal and financial sense, but the culture built around it never develops, and the company does not see the operational or financial lift that a genuine ownership mindset can produce.
Three Things That Separate a Working Ownership Culture From Paperwork
Companies that get this right tend to share three characteristics.
Employees understand how their actions affect the share price, and how the share price affects them. This does not require teaching every employee how to build a valuation model. It can be as simple as translating a specific behavior into a dollar figure employees can picture. For example, a company with a driver-based workforce that finds a way to save time or fuel on each route can show employees, in plain terms, how that saving compounds across the whole team and shows up in the company’s profit — and ultimately in the share price that determines their own account value.
Leadership is transparent about company financial performance. Business owners sometimes hesitate to share detailed financial information with employees, worried it will trigger requests for raises or benefits the company cannot support. That concern is understandable, but companies that withhold basic financial context tend to have employees who feel at arm’s length from the business and do not act like owners as a result. Transparency does not require disclosing every line item. It can mean walking employees through, at a high level, how profit gets allocated — debt service on ESOP-related financing, working capital needs, a savings buffer to protect jobs during a downturn, and what is left over for growth investment — so employees understand the constraints leadership is working within, not just the headline number.
The company is willing to work through early friction rather than treating it as failure. Building an ownership culture rarely goes perfectly from day one. Employees may misunderstand the level of autonomy that comes with ownership, take on too much of the associated risk-taking without enough of the responsibility, or simply need time to internalize what ownership means for how they show up at work. Companies that treat these adjustment periods as a normal part of the process, rather than evidence that employee ownership isn’t working, are more likely to come out the other side with a culture that holds.
A Real Example: Small Operational Changes Compounding Into Value
Legacy Utility Group, a California-based company that performs pipeline construction under roadways and is expanding into Nevada and Texas, became employee owned for a minority stake in early 2025. One of the changes that followed involved something simple: drivers began turning off truck engines at job sites instead of letting them idle, a habit that previously went unaddressed. Aggregated across the company’s driver base, the fuel savings were substantial, and for a company operating at a meaningful profit multiple, that kind of recurring operational saving can translate into a real increase in company valuation over time.
The underlying mechanism is straightforward: when employees understand that their day-to-day decisions affect a number that eventually affects their own account balance, and when leadership makes that connection explicit rather than assuming employees will figure it out, small changes made across an entire workforce can add up to a result no single management decision could produce on its own.
Looking Ahead
An ESOP transaction is the legal and financial starting point for employee ownership. Whether that ownership translates into better performance, stronger retention, and long-term wealth for employees depends on what a company does afterward — specifically, whether it builds a culture where employees understand how they affect the business and how the business affects them, whether leadership is transparent about financial performance, and whether the company is willing to work through the adjustment period that comes with any real culture change.
Business owners considering an ESOP, or already operating one, should treat the education and communication side of ownership with the same seriousness as the transaction itself. The structure creates the opportunity. The ongoing work determines whether that opportunity turns into results.
If you are evaluating whether an ESOP makes sense for your company, or want to talk through how to build a stronger ownership culture around an existing plan, Menke’s Feasibility Questionnaire for a Free Preliminary Analysis is a good starting point. You can also reach our team directly through our Contact Us page.
Considering an ESOP?
Request a confidential preliminary feasibility review to evaluate:
- structural viability
- liquidity and control
- tax advantages
- succession options
No cost. No obligation.
Related Resources
About ESOP Radio
ESOP Radio is the official ESOP podcast from Menke — where real stories of growth, succession, and long-term wealth building are told.
Hosted by Trevor Gilmore and Ben Spadt, the show features conversations and educational episodes designed to help business owners better understand employee ownership.
Disclaimer
This podcast is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or fiduciary advice.
Phil DeDominicis is an ESOP strategist and M&A advisor who has guided 300+ companies through ESOP formations, financing, and transactions over 20+ years at Menke & Associates. He specializes in selling ESOP‑owned businesses to financial or strategic buyers and in helping ESOP companies acquire other businesses.




