September 14, 2026

Why Growing AEC Firms Outgrow Relationship-Only Marketing

Relationships Win Work, Until the Firm Needs to Scale

Architecture, engineering, and construction firms have long grown through referrals, repeat clients, and the personal networks of founders and senior leaders. That model can carry a company a long way. It becomes harder to rely on when a firm sets growth targets beyond what its current relationships can produce, enters a new geographic market, or completes an acquisition.

The common misunderstanding is about what marketing is. In many AEC firms, marketing means proposals, social posts, client gifts, and event planning. Those activities have a place, but proposals are closer to a sales function. The strategic side of marketing, deciding which clients to pursue and how the firm is positioned, often has no clear owner. It may sit low on the CEO’s agenda, be treated as an expense line by finance, or fall to a junior employee with little authority.

This post covers how an outsourced chief marketing officer typically structures an engagement, why an ideal client profile is usually the first priority, how sales and marketing can work toward the same goals, and why telling the firm’s story matters more as older relationships phase out.

šŸŽ™ļø Listen to the Episode

How a Fractional CMO Engagement Usually Works

Perryn Olson has worked in construction marketing for more than 20 years and now leads a firm that provides outsourced, or fractional, CMO leadership to AEC companies, mostly mid-size contractors. A fractional CMO is a senior marketing executive who works part time across several clients rather than full time for one. He describes the role as the CEO’s right hand on the non-operational side of growth: identifying the levers available, such as new service lines, new geographic markets, or acquisitions, and shaping how the company presents itself.

Foundation, then lead generation, then scale

Olson generally works in phases. The first is foundational: defining the company’s voice, tone, and messaging, and fixing a website that no longer reflects the business. Only then does lead generation make sense. He described a client frustrated by a lack of inbound leads. Turning on paid search or social ads at that stage, he said, would have meant paying for traffic that would not convert. Scaling comes after the foundation and lead flow are working.

Typical timeline

According to Olson, engagements aimed at standing up a marketing team typically run about 18 to 24 months. Often the client asks him to define the roles needed, hire a marketing director, get that person established, and then step back into an advisory role. The broader work of maturing a marketing function can take several years.

Start With an Ideal Client Profile

An ideal client profile is a clear, shared definition of the clients a firm is best positioned to serve and most wants to win. Olson builds one with every client, along with a scoring system that works much like the go/no-go sheets contractors already use to decide whether to bid a project. The question simply moves upstream: should we pursue this client at all?

He gave an example from a firm outside construction whose owner wanted salespeople chasing larger opportunities. The firm said it did a lot of healthcare and government work. A short conversation narrowed that considerably. One side of the business did best with hospitals, another with medical office buildings, and the government work that went well was with suburban and semi-rural local governments rather than large cities. Once that was spelled out, the sales team knew who to call, and Olson said the refinement changed how they sold.

Ask operations, not only sales

Olson often asks operations teams which clients they like working with. A client who is a good operational fit, he said, tends to close faster, stay longer, and create less friction for employees. Bad-fit clients frustrate project teams and can cost a firm good people. For one CEO who could not afford to drop poor-fit clients immediately, Olson built a multi-phase profile: bring in better clients while gradually exiting the wrong ones over roughly five years.

Getting Sales and Marketing on the Same Page

Sales and marketing often disagree on targets, process, and messaging. Olson’s approach is to agree first on two things: revenue goals and the ideal client profile. The rest of the conversation is about how to get there.

Because construction sales cycles often cannot be shortened, since a building will not start any sooner, he focuses instead on positioning the firm well enough to face fewer competitors on each pursuit. He also uses CRM lead scoring, which ranks contacts by firm characteristics and recent activity such as conference meetings, website visits, or email opens. A salesperson then sees the ten people to call this week rather than an unsorted list of a thousand.

Why the Website Still Matters

Contractors are right that they do not sell buildings through a website. Olson’s point is that they can lose projects and job candidates there. Prospects and potential hires who hear about a firm look it up, and generic messaging or an outdated site sends them elsewhere without ever reaching the CRM. He described a roofing client for whom roughly 60 percent of inbound website traffic now comes from past clients, some from projects a decade or more old, traffic the company was not getting before its messaging and website were redone.

Competing on Value Instead of Price

Asked what sets them apart, Olson said, at least half of contractors answer “on time, on budget,” and many of the rest point to their people. When clients see no meaningful difference, they tend to choose the lowest price. He believes the answer lies in communicating the problem-solving that happens on job sites: the accelerated schedule on a busy street, and the challenges both anticipated and solved along the way. Prospects want evidence that the firm has handled situations like theirs.

One way he supports this is by adding content specialists to client teams to gather stories from the field for both business development and recruiting. He also described a trade contractor that chose to focus on its ideal client profile rather than match a low-cost competitor, and improved its margins while top-line revenue grew only modestly.

Looking Ahead

The relationships that built many AEC firms are concentrated in people who are nearing retirement. The next generation often inherits a strong reputation but not the network that produced it. For firms planning growth or an ownership transition, including firms that are or may become employee-owned, it is worth asking now who owns marketing, whether leadership agrees on the ideal client, and whether a prospect who has never heard of the firm would understand what it does after a minute on its website.

Perryn Olson has worked in construction marketing for more than 20 years, including roles as vice president of marketing and chief marketing officer at a national construction and engineering firm. He now leads AEC CMOs, which provides outsourced chief marketing officer leadership to architecture, engineering, and construction firms, primarily mid-size contractors. Learn more at aeccmos.com, or connect with Perryn on LinkedIn.

If you are weighing how growth planning and ownership transition fit together, Menke & Associates can help you evaluate whether an ESOP is a practical option for your company. Start with our Feasibility Questionnaire for a free preliminary analysis, or contact our team to talk through your situation.

Considering an ESOP?

Request a confidential preliminary feasibility review to evaluate:

    • structural viability
    • liquidity and control
    • tax advantages
    • succession options

No cost. No obligation.

About ESOP Radio

ESOP Radio is the official ESOP podcast from Menke — where real stories of growth, succession, and long-term wealth building are told.

Hosted by Trevor Gilmore and Ben Spadt, the show features conversations and educational episodes designed to help business owners better understand employee ownership.

Disclaimer

This podcast is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or fiduciary advice.

Share this article:
LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
WhatsApp

Learn why an ESOP is better for You,
your Business, and your Employees

Upcoming Web Seminar

Free 90-Minute Webinar for Business Owners, CFOs & Advisors

Learn how ESOPs fuel growth, reduce taxes, and power succession—without giving up control.

Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds

Why 2026 is the Time for ESOPs

Strong companies are using ESOPs to play offense. With rates stabilizing and talent still tight, employee ownership is delivering a durable edge:

    • Founder Liquidity—On Your Terms. Create a market for your shares without selling to private equity or competitors.
    • Major Tax Efficiency. Enable capital‑gains deferral for selling shareholders (Section 1042 eligibility) and reduce or even eliminate ongoing corporate income tax for S‑Corporation ESOPs—freeing cash for growth.
    • Talent Magnet. Meaningful employee ownership boosts engagement, retention, and performance—without relying solely on wage increases.
    • Resilient Margins. ESOP tax advantages help counter wage pressure, input costs, and tariffs—so more operating cash flows to strategy.
    • Control & Culture Intact. Transition ownership while keeping leadership and values in place.. Transition ownership while keeping leadership and values in place.

Bottom line: ESOPs create a rare win‑win‑win—for owners, the business, and employees.

What You’ll Learn

ESOP 101—Modern Playbook
How ESOPs work in 2026, who qualifies, deal structures, and timelines.

Tax Strategies that Change the Math
Capital‑gains deferral, corporate tax reduction/elimination for S‑Corp ESOPs, deductible contributions, and cash‑flow modeling.

Talent & Culture
Retention without across‑the‑board raises; ownership communications that actually move the needle.

Protecting Margins
How ESOP incentives can offset cost inflation and support reinvestment.

Valuation & Financing in Today’s Market
Bank/seller notes, mezzanine options, rate considerations, and why ā€œbankable ESOPsā€ are closing now.

Governance & Control
Board, trustee, and management roles—what really changes (and what doesn’t).

Who Should Attend

    • Business OwnersĀ planning an exit, partial sale, or recapitalization

    • CFOsĀ evaluating capital structure and tax strategy

    • Advisors & Succession PlannersĀ guiding owner‑led companies

    • HR & ESOP Committee MembersĀ building engagement around ownership

Agenda (90 Minutes)

    1. Welcome, Speakers & Why ESOPs in 2026Ā (5 min)
      Quick orientation; who Menke is and why ESOPs are winning right now.
    2. ESOP Basics & Business Owner BenefitsĀ (10 min)
      What an ESOP is; liquidity, diversification, succession, productivity.
    3. Myth‑Busting: What ESOPs Do—and Don’t—RequireĀ (5 min)
      No, you don’t have to sell 30%+, borrow big, or give up control.
    4. Deal Structures & Transaction PathsĀ (10 min)
      Cash‑contribution (pay‑as‑you‑go), leveraged (bank/seller notes), and stock contribution; when each fits.
    5. Typical Scenarios & OutcomesĀ (10 min)
      Gradual sales, minority/majority sales, 100% buyouts, and recap strategies.
    6. Who’s a Strong Fit (and Common Constraints)Ā (5 min)
      Profitability, team/transition readiness, industry notes.
    7. Tax Strategy Deep DiveĀ (10 min)
      S‑Corp ESOP distribution savings; C‑Corp §1042 capital‑gains deferral; entity‑path options.
    8. Valuation & Pricing vs. Third‑Party SalesĀ (8 min)
      FMV standards, control vs. minority value, practical comparisons.
    9. Financing the ESOPĀ (8 min)
      Bank market overview, seller paper, balance‑sheet effects, cash‑flow modeling.
    10. Plan Operations & Employee CommunicationsĀ (8 min)
      Eligibility, vesting, distributions, disclosures, and how transparency drives results.
    11. Culture, Engagement & Measured Performance UpliftĀ (6 min)
      What changes on day 2; tying ownership to productivity.
    12. Roadmap & Next StepsĀ (3 min)
      Feasibility, design/adopt, contributions, and timing the sale.
    13. Live Q&AĀ (2 min)

Hear From Past Attendees

ā€œI came in skeptical. I left with a concrete roadmap and the math to brief our board.ā€

ā€œThis clarified our exit plan and showed how we can reward employees at the same time."

Your Presenter: Phil DeDominicis

Phil DeDominicisĀ is an ESOP strategist and M&A advisor who has guided 300+ companies through ESOP formations, financing, and transactions overĀ 20+ years at Menke & Associates. He specializes inĀ selling ESOP‑owned businessesĀ to financial or strategic buyers and inĀ helping ESOP companies acquire other businesses.

Before Menke, Phil spentĀ 14 years in investment banking M&AĀ atĀ Morgan StanleyĀ andĀ Salomon Smith Barney, advising middle‑market companies on change‑of‑control transactions. He holds aĀ B.S. in Chemical EngineeringĀ from theĀ University of DelawareĀ (1985) and anĀ MBA in Finance & AccountingĀ fromĀ UCLA AndersonĀ (1989). Phil currently serves onĀ six for‑profit and not‑for‑profit boards.

What Phil will cover:

    • Where ESOPs win in 2026 (tax, talent, and control)
    • Owner liquidity paths: minority, majority, and 100% sales
    • Financing options and what lenders look for
    • Valuation reality vs. third‑party sales
    • How to prep a board, trustee, and employees for a successful close

Reserve Your Spot Now

Seats are limited.Ā Save yours now and receive the ESOP Feasibility Checklist.

10:00AM – 11:30AM PT
11:00AM – 12:30PM MT
12:00PM – 1:30PM CT
1:00PM – 2:30PM ET

No cost. Suitable for companies with $5M–$500M+ in revenue across construction, manufacturing, services, distribution, tech, and more.

FAQ (Quick Hits)

    • Do I lose control?Ā No—most ESOPs preserve day‑to‑day control with your leadership team and board.

    • Is this only for certain industries?Ā ESOPs work across sectors when cash flow is stable and leadership continuity matters.

    • Can we do a partial sale?Ā Yes—stage liquidity over time while capturing tax benefits.

READY FOR AN ESOP NOW?

Interested in finding out how an ESOP could work for your company?

For a free preliminary analysis, just fill out our ESOP Feasibility Questionnaire.

Related Articles

Man viewing employee stock ownership plan presentation on computer screen.
July 29, 2026
Don’t miss this opportunity to discover how ESOPs can align your business goals with the needs of employees and stakeholders.
Partially completed timber frame on a stone foundation, representing a second stage ESOP transaction to full ownership
September 28, 2026
Your minority ESOP has worked. The debt is paid down and the culture has taken hold. Selling the rest of the company to the ESOP can look like a repeat of the first deal, but valuation, financing, and governance all change once the ESOP takes control.
Brass straightedge on slate, representing consistent ESOP valuation standards under new federal law
September 17, 2026
For fifty years, the hardest question in employee ownership was not how to finance the deal or how to structure the tax benefits. It was what “adequate consideration” actually meant. Congress has now answered it — and the answer is narrower, and more useful, than the headlines suggest.
Unfinished steel-frame building with a focused beam of light, representing AEC marketing and ideal client focus
September 14, 2026
Most contractors say they win work on relationships, and most are right, up to a point. What happens when the people who hold those relationships retire, or when the firm tries to grow into a market where nobody knows its name?
Abstract suspended architectural span under cable tension, representing the long-term structure of a Section 1042 tax deferral
August 31, 2026
A seller who elects Section 1042 on a $100 million ESOP transaction can defer roughly $33 million in capital gains tax, potentially for life. The same election, structured without care, can leave that seller carrying leverage on a securities portfolio for decades. The difference is in how the portfolio is built.
Abstract network of interconnected nodes representing ESOP employee ownership culture
August 17, 2026
Two companies can have identical ESOP structures on paper and produce completely different results. The difference usually comes down to three specific things — and most companies get at least one of them wrong.
Abstract image of a converging path symbolizing a 2026 ESOP market midyear review
August 3, 2026
Halfway through 2026, the ESOP market looks different than it did in January — bank lending is more competitive, private equity firms are eyeing ESOPs as an exit, and legislation is moving. Here’s what’s actually changed.