The Financing Picture for ESOPs Is Shifting
For years, business owners exploring an ESOP have run into the same obstacle: financing. Traditional ESOP transactions have relied heavily on senior bank debt covering only a portion of a company’s value, with the remainder typically filled by a seller note. That gap has made it harder for ESOPs to compete with other buyers who can bring more cash to the table at closing.
Most business owners assume the ESOP financing landscape is static, that the same lending menu and the same regulatory posture that existed five years ago still apply today. That assumption is increasingly out of date. Both the regulatory environment around ESOPs and the way banks are structuring ESOP loans have changed meaningfully over the past year, and those changes affect how much cash a seller can realistically expect at closing.
This post covers three developments worth understanding before you start (or restart) an ESOP conversation: a significant change in how the Department of Labor approaches ESOP oversight, legislation working through Congress that targets valuation standards and the financing gap directly, and new flexibility from lenders that is changing what a typical ESOP loan looks like.
šļø Listen to the Episode
Video Transcript
Chapter 1: Welcome and episode overview
Chapter 2: DOL removes ESOPs from national enforcement priority list
Chapter 3: Bill would define “adequate consideration” for ESOP stock valuation
Chapter 4: Employee Ownership Fairness Act and contribution limits
Chapter 5: Proposed federal loan guarantee facility for ESOP financing
Chapter 6: FY2027 appropriations bill addresses the ESOP financing gap
Chapter 7: Business succession and generational ownership trends
Chapter 8: How ESOP lenders are getting more creative
Chapter 9: Long-term bank relationships and ESOP lending
Chapter 10: Seller notes and financing structures
Chapter 11: Current ESOP interest rates
Chapter 12: Outlook for the second half of 2026
Chapter 13: Employee interest in ESOP-owned companies
Chapter 14: Valuation expectations vs. price
Chapter 15: Why company fundamentals matter more than legislation
A Major Shift in DOL Enforcement
For years, the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) treated ESOPs as a national enforcement priority, meaning ESOP transactions received a heightened level of scrutiny beyond normal plan oversight. That posture contributed to an adversarial relationship between the agency and the ESOP community.
In January 2026, the Department of Labor removed ESOPs entirely from its national enforcement priority list. This signals a move toward a more principles-based oversight framework, which generally means fewer surprise audits and lawsuits and a more predictable compliance environment for ESOP companies, trustees, and advisors. Business owners weighing an ESOP for the first time should understand this as a change in posture, not a change in the underlying fiduciary and valuation rules ESOPs are still required to follow. Any specific compliance question should still be reviewed with ERISA counsel.
Legislation That Could Reshape Valuation and Financing
Several bills are currently working their way through Congress that directly address two of the biggest pain points in ESOP transactions: valuation certainty and financing access.
Defining “Adequate Consideration”
One bill, the Retire Through Ownership Act (S. 2403 in the Senate, sponsored by Sens. Roger Marshall and Tim Kaine; H.R. 5169 in the House, sponsored by Rep. Rick Allen), would provide a clearer definition of “adequate consideration” for valuing closely held stock, building on the standard set out in IRS Revenue Ruling 59-60. Currently, what counts as adequate consideration in an ESOP transaction has been something of a gray area. The Senate passed the bill by unanimous consent in October 2025, and the House Education and Workforce Committee approved the companion bill unanimously in September 2025; it is now awaiting a vote before the full House. If signed into law, it would give ESOP fiduciaries a clearer, more defined standard to rely on when relying on independent appraisals.
Removing ESOPs From Standard Contribution Limits
A second bill, the Employee Ownership Fairness Act, would remove ESOP contributions from the standard defined contribution plan testing limits that also apply to 401(k) plans (commonly referred to as 415 and 404 testing). Under current rules, ESOP contributions can trigger refunds or excise taxes if combined contribution limits are exceeded. This bill would treat ESOP contributions separately, allowing employees to benefit fully from both a 401(k) and an ESOP without running into those combined limits. As of mid-2026, the bill has not yet received a committee vote; it was held back over cost concerns and is still being refined, so its path forward should be confirmed before referencing it as active legislation.
A Federal Loan Guarantee Facility for ESOPs
The most significant proposal under discussion, the American Ownership and Resilience Act (H.R. 3248 in the House, sponsored by Rep. Blake Moore; S. 1645 in the Senate, sponsored by Sens. Chris Van Hollen and Jerry Moran), would establish a zero-subsidy investment facility at the Commerce Department, aimed specifically at closing the ESOP financing gap. Rather than the government lending directly, the bill would license private investment funds, called Ownership Investment Companies, to raise and manage capital for ESOP sales, backed by federal loan guarantees, in a structure similar in concept to FHA or SBA-backed lending. The goal is to give sellers a source of financing beyond a senior bank loan and a seller note, at no direct cost to taxpayers beyond administrative costs. As of this recording, the bill remains active in committee. Separately, the FY2027 appropriations bill includes language directing the Commerce Department to address the ESOP financing gap, and the accompanying committee report specifically recognizes ESOPs as a tool for retaining American companies through business succession. Neither of these has been signed into law, and business owners should treat this as a proposal to watch rather than a financing option available today.
How ESOP Lenders Are Getting More Flexible
Beyond legislation, banks themselves are changing how they structure ESOP loans. A growing number of banks now have dedicated ESOP lending teams, a shift from a lending market that was historically limited to a small group of niche players.
Tiered, Covenant-Based Structures
Rather than issuing a single fixed loan amount, some banks are now structuring ESOP loans in tiers, sometimes called an accordion structure. As an illustrative example discussed on the episode: if a company is valued at six times profit, a bank might initially lend two times profit while holding an additional commitment in reserve. If the company meets its financial covenants over a set period, ranging from a few quarters up to roughly two years, the bank releases additional committed funds without requiring a new loan process or a new round of due diligence. This gives sellers an upfront payment they can use for a Section 1042 rollover or other reinvestment, while the remaining commitment is released as the company demonstrates continued performance.
Seller notes remain a standard part of the financing mix as well. The classic structure, a senior bank loan covering one to two times profit paired with a seller note for the remainder, is still common, though delayed-draw note structures have expanded the range of options available.
Where Interest Rates Stand
Current ESOP senior loan pricing is generally running at SOFR plus approximately 1.5 to 2.5 percentage points, depending on company size and cash flow, which translates to roughly high-4% to low-6% rates as of this recording. That compares to a period roughly two years earlier when Prime stood at 8.5%. Rates are tied to prevailing benchmark rates and will move with the broader rate environment, so current figures should be verified with a lender at the time of any transaction.
Valuation Expectations for the Rest of 2026
Despite the positive financing and regulatory developments, valuation expectations remain a point business owners should approach carefully. It’s worth separating two concepts: valuation, which is a range, and price, which is what a transaction actually closes at.
For most ESOP transactions, because target companies tend to be mature, stabilized businesses with steady rather than speculative growth, pricing typically falls within a single-digit EBITDA multiple (EBITDA being a common shorthand for profit before certain non-cash and financing costs). This is a different environment than headline-grabbing valuations tied to speculative growth assumptions. Business owners should also not expect a repeat of the kind of broad, one-time valuation lift that came from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s corporate tax rate changes; no similarly sweeping change is on the table currently. Instead, company-level fundamentals, operating cash flow, and the trend in profitability are what will primarily drive valuation in the current environment. Any specific valuation discussion should involve a qualified valuation professional familiar with your company’s financials and industry.
Looking Ahead
Taken together, these developments point toward a more workable environment for ESOP transactions than in recent years: a less adversarial regulatory posture, legislation aimed directly at the financing gap, and lenders willing to structure deals more flexibly. None of this changes the fundamentals, however. Company cash flow, valuation discipline, and realistic planning still drive whether an ESOP makes sense for a given business. Business owners who are considering succession options should use this environment to start, or revisit, that planning conversation now rather than waiting for legislation that has not yet passed.
If you are weighing an ESOP against other succession options, Menke can walk through what the current financing and regulatory landscape means for your specific situation. Start with our Feasibility Questionnaire for a Free Preliminary Analysis, or contact us directly to talk through where you stand.
The information in this post is drawn from an ESOP Radio episode discussion and is intended for educational purposes only. Tax rules, ERISA requirements, plan document provisions, and individual financial circumstances vary. Consult your CPA, financial advisor, or ERISA counsel before making decisions about ESOP distributions, IRA rollovers, or retirement planning.
Considering an ESOP?
Request a confidential preliminary feasibility review to evaluate:
- structural viability
- liquidity and control
- tax advantages
- succession options
No cost. No obligation.
Related Resources
About ESOP Radio
ESOP Radio is the official ESOP podcast from Menke ā where real stories of growth, succession, and long-term wealth building are told.
Hosted by Trevor Gilmore and Ben Spadt, the show features conversations and educational episodes designed to help business owners better understand employee ownership.
Disclaimer
This podcast is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or fiduciary advice.
Phil DeDominicisĀ is an ESOP strategist and M&A advisor who has guided 300+ companies through ESOP formations, financing, and transactions overĀ 20+ years at Menke & Associates. He specializes inĀ selling ESOPāowned businessesĀ to financial or strategic buyers and inĀ helping ESOP companies acquire other businesses.




